Legal Opinion
Santa Monica Rent Control Board v. Bluvshtein
California Court of Appeal
Decided April 25, 1991No. B045711PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
WOODS (Fred), J.
Plaintiff Santa Monica Rent Control Board (Board) appeals from an order dismissing its second amended complaint (SAC) after a demurrer was sustained without leave to amend. Since we agree with the trial court’s finding that the Board cannot state a cause of action, we affirm.
Factual and Procedural Synopsis
A. Introduction
On August 3, 1988, the Board filed a complaint against respondents 1 as individuals and doing business as 808 5th Street Trust and others. 2 On April 6, 1989, the Board filed the SAC, the pleading relevant to this appeal. The SAC contains causes of…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Nash v. City of Santa MonicaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
- Heckendorn v. City of San MarinoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1986
- Von Goerlitz v. TurnerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
- Granberry v. Islay InvestmentsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
- Stone v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Wells v. One2One Learning FoundationCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
- Paulus v. Bob Lynch Ford, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2006
- Golden West Baseball Co. v. City of AnaheimCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
- Janis v. California State Lottery CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
- Notrica v. State Compensation Insurance FundCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.