Legal Opinion
A-1 Amusement Co. v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided October 19, 2000No. 98-192 CPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
HEWITT, Judge.
Plaintiffs own and operate cigarette vending machine businesses. They have filed a complaint against the United States alleging that certain regulations promulgated by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA or agency or government) effected a temporary taking of their businesses.1 The matter is now before the court on Defendant’s Partial Motion to Dismiss (Def.’s Mot.). In aceor-*64dance with this court’s Order of May 23, 2000, the parties have designated Tuscaloosa Vending Company as the test case plaintiff for the purpose of this motion.2 For the following…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Food & Drug Administration v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Larson v. Domestic and Foreign Commerce Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Ruckelshaus v. Monsanto Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Regional Rail Reorganization Act CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- A-1 Cigarette Vending, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2001
- Watson v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2001
- Board Machine, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2001
- Automated Services, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2001
- Pavlic Vending Service, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2001