Legal Opinion

Summers v. Hallam Cooley Enterprices Ltd.

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 14, 1942No. Civ. 3213PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBarnard, P. J.

In this action to quiet title the plaintiff appeals from a judgment in favor of the defendant bank as trustee. The other defendant, which had owned the land and executed the trust deeds in question, defaulted. For convenience, the defendant bank, as trustee, will be referred to as the respondent. It held a note secured by a trust deed on the property in question which will be referred to as the first trust deed. The appellant held a note secured by a trust deed on the same property which by its terms was made subject to the first trust deed, and which will be referred to as the second trust…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Bank of Italy National Trust & Savings Ass'n v. BentleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
  2. Wood v. GoodfellowCalifornia Supreme Court · 1872
  3. Flack v. BolandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
  4. Brandenstein v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
  5. Ekmann v. Plumas County BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Sipe v. McKennaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
  2. Penzner v. FosterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
  3. Carson Redevelopment Agency v. AdamCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982
  4. State v. WilliamsSuperior Court of Delaware · 1949
  5. In re SukhuDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API