Legal Opinion

In re Sukhu

District Court, N.D. California

Decided November 29, 1989No. Bankruptcy No. 3-89-01028-KTCPublished

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

THOMAS E. CARLSON, Bankruptcy Judge.

This case concerns the degree to which sections 882.020-882.040 of the California Civil Code overrule prior judicial decisions holding that a power of sale under a deed of trust .is never barred by the statute of limitations. I conclude that under the statute enforcement of a deed of trust is not barred when an action on the underlying obligation is barred, but only when the special non-tolling statute of limitations established by section 882.020 has run.

The relevant facts are simple and are undisputed. Debtor executed a promissory note in favor of…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Hohn v. Riverside County Flood Control & Water Conservation DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
  2. Travelli v. BowmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
  3. Penzner v. FosterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
  4. Sacramento Bank v. MurphyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
  5. Carson Redevelopment Agency v. AdamCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API