Legal Opinion

Brandenstein v. Johnson

California Supreme Court

Decided August 27, 1903No. S.F. No. 2544PublishedCited by 25 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. Henry U. Brandenstein, and Percy Clarke Church, for Appellant.

1Opinion of the CourtMcFARLAND, J.

This is an action to foreclose a mortgage on certain land, executed by defendant R. B. Johnson to plaintiff on December 12, 1892, to secure a promissory note of that date, whereby defendant Johnson promised to pay plaintiff or order five thousand dollars, with interest, two years after date. The Fresno Loan and Savings Bank, a corporation, and R. E. Minier were made defendants, upon the averments that they claimed some interest in the mortgaged premises which are averred to be subsequent and subject to.the lien of plaintiff’s mortgage. The Fresno Flume and Irrigation Company, a corporation,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Lord v. MorrisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1861
  2. Wood v. GoodfellowCalifornia Supreme Court · 1872
  3. Watt v. WrightCalifornia Supreme Court · 1884
  4. Belloc v. DavisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1869
  5. Filipini v. TrobockCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Boucofski v. JacobsenUtah Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Hibernia Sav. and Loan Soc. v. FarnhamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Flack v. BolandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
  4. Stryker v. RaschWyoming Supreme Court · 1941
  5. California Credit & Collection Corp. v. GoodinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API