Legal Opinion

Wood v. Goodfellow

California Supreme Court

Decided January 15, 1872No. 2,169PublishedCited by 50 opinions

Appeal from the District Court of the Tenth Judicial District, Sierra County. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

By the Court,

Crockett, J.:

This is an action to foreclose a mortgage made by Good-fellow in June, 1860, on his undivided interest in the Keystone mine and mill. The mortgage was duly recorded about the time it was executed. Subsequently, in October, 1860, and May, 1862, two other mortgages were made upon the whole property by Goodfellow and the other joint owners, which two last named mortgages, in October, 1862, were duly assigned-to Harris & McCarthy, who immediately commenced an action to foreclose them, but failed to make Wood, the holder of the first mortgage, a party to the action. On…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Lord v. MorrisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1861
  2. Barber v. BabelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1868
  3. Sichel v. De CarrilloCalifornia Supreme Court · 1871
  4. Belloc v. DavisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1869
  5. McCarthy v. WhiteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1863

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by50 opinions

  1. Schmucker v. SibertSupreme Court of Kansas · 1877
  2. Boucofski v. JacobsenUtah Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Ward v. WatermanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  4. Watt v. WrightCalifornia Supreme Court · 1884
  5. Colonial & United States Mortgage Co. v. Northwest Thresher Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1905

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API