Ekmann v. Plumas County Bank
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtSeawell, J.
The question presented by this appeal is whether a mortgagor, by waiving or extending the bar of the statute of limitations, can affect the rights of a junior holder of a trust deed, which has no knowledge of and does not consent to the agreement of waiver entered into between the senior mortgagee and mortgagor.
On October 6, 1921, George W. McMillan and Mary E. McMillan, Ms wife, being the owners of the real property in suit, acknowledged two deeds wherein said McMillan and wife were grantors and J. C. Boyle was grantee. Said deeds were not delivered or recorded until October 23, 1925, and…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Lord v. MorrisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1861
- Wood v. GoodfellowCalifornia Supreme Court · 1872
- Newhall v. HatchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
- Chapman v. HughesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
- Smitton v. McCulloughCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Copp v. MillenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
- Adolph Ramish, Inc. v. WoodruffCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
- Bank of California v. McCoyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
- Summers v. Hallam Cooley Enterprices Ltd.California Court of Appeal · 1942
- Wood v. WilleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.