Legal Opinion

Penzner v. Foster

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 1, 1959No. Civ. 5693PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STONE, J. pro tem. *

This is an appeal from a judgment in an action brought by appellants to quiet title to a parcel of real property. The trial court decreed that appellants’ title is subject to a lien pursuant to a deed of trust owned by respondent and that the balance due on the note secured by the deed of trust was $14,156,44 at the time judgment was entered.

The appellants purchased the parcel of real property which is located in the city of Fresno from the Normandie Corporation. At the time of the conveyance the property was encumbered by a deed of trust that secured a promissory note in…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Haines v. Commercial Mortgage Co.California Supreme Court · 1927
  2. Sharp v. Mortgage Security Corp. of AmericaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
  3. French v. Mortgage Guarantee Co.California Supreme Court · 1940
  4. Sipe v. McKennaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
  5. Pacific Finance Corp. v. CraneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Hohn v. Riverside County Flood Control & Water Conservation DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
  2. McConnell v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Union Bank v. KrugerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1969
  4. MONTGOMERY FEDERAL SAVINGS AND LOAN ASS'N v. BaerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1973
  5. Curry v. MoodyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API