Legal Opinion
Fineman v. Armstrong World Industries, Inc.
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided October 8, 1991No. Civ. A. 84-3837PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BISSELL, District Judge.
This matter arises pursuant to several motions made by the defendant in light of the jury verdict reached on April 19, 1991. Defendant Armstrong World Industries, Inc. (“Armstrong”) has renewed its earlier motion to dismiss all claims of the plaintiff, for judgment notwithstanding the verdict (J.N.O.V.), and for a new trial in the alternative.
I. FACTS AND BACKGROUND
Trial in this action took place over nearly three months, generating considerable evidence. Necessarily, then, the following is merely a summary of the background and procedural history. Where…
2Cases cited81 opinions
- United States v. Grinnell Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Brown Shoe Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- United States v. E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1956
- American Tobacco Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- United States v. Aluminum Co. of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1945
76 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Lightning Lube, Inc. v. Witco Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
- Elliot Fineman the Industry Network System, Inc. v. Armstrong World Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992
- Lightning Lube, Inc. v. Witco Corp.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1992
- Kingsepp v. Wesleyan UniversityDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1992
- Kramer v. TribeDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1994
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.