Legal Opinion
Elliot Fineman the Industry Network System, Inc. v. Armstrong World Industries, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided November 24, 1992No. 91-5613PublishedCited by 343 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
MANSMANN, Circuit Judge.
In a civil action brought in the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey, an entrepreneur, Elliot Fine-man, and his corporation, The Industry Network System, Inc. (TINS), sought to recover against Armstrong World Industries, Inc., a prominent manufacturer of floor covering products, for losses sustained after TINS folded. Conceived in late 1988, the TINS concept employed novel video technology to produce a monthly videotape magazine for retailers of floor covering products to be sold through distributors. Fineman contended that…
2Cases cited65 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- First Nat. Bank of Ariz. v. Cities Service Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
- United States v. Grinnell Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Brunswick Corp. v. Pueblo Bowl-O-Mat, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by343 opinions
- Fowler v. UPMC SHADYSIDECourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2009
- Lightning Lube, Inc. v. Witco Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
- Barbara R. Sheridan v. E.I. Dupont De Nemours and Company, Jacques AmblardCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1996
- Schuylkill Energy Resources, Inc. v. Pennsylvania Power & Light CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
- Howard Hess Dental Laboratories Inc. v. Dentsply International, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2010
338 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.