Legal Opinion
Kramer v. Tribe
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided July 15, 1994No. Civ. A. No. 93-5361 (WGB)PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BASSLER, District Judge:
This matter comes before the Court on the motion of Defendants, Laurence H. Tribe, Esq., Jonathan S. Massey, Esq., and Kenneth J. Chesebro, Esq., former appellate counsel for Lightning Lube, Inc. (collectively referred to as “Appellate Counsel”), for sanctions against the Plaintiff, Steven M. Kramer, Esq., former trial counsel for Lightning Lube, Inc. (“Lightning Lube”), pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 11, 28 U.S.C. § 1927 and the Court’s inherent authority to supervise and monitor the conduct of attorneys admitted to practice. The Court has…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Chambers v. Nasco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Hughes v. RoweSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Christiansburg Garment Co. v. Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Televideo Systems, Inc. K. Philip Hwang C. Gemma Hwang v. Fred P. Heidenthal, Individually and Dba South Harbor Investors and West Cliff SecuritiesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- Lightning Lube, Inc. v. Witco Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Bennie Whitehead v. Food Max of Mississippi, Inc., Kmart Corporation v. Paul S. MinorCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2003
- Carlino v. Gloucester City High SchoolDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1999
- Tidik v. RitsemaDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1996
- Ortman v. ThomasDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1995
- Mruz v. Caring, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2000
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.