Legal Opinion
Kingsepp v. Wesleyan University
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided June 2, 1992No. 89 Civ. 6121 (DNE)PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION & ORDER
EDELSTEIN, District Judge:
Plaintiff Roger Kingsepp has moved pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 23 (“Rule 23”) to certify a class of plaintiffs for purposes of this antitrust action. For the reasons stated below, plaintiff’s motion is denied.
I. BACKGROUND
Plaintiff Roger Kingsepp, a recent graduate of Wesleyan University, brought this antitrust action on behalf of himself and others similarly situated. The defendants are twelve non-profit institutions of higher education. The Complaint alleges that defendants “have engaged in a conspiracy to fix or artificially inflate the price of…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- General Telephone Co. of Southwest v. FalconSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Eisen v. Carlisle & JacquelinSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- 9 Fair empl.prac.cas. 211, 9 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 9931 Sandra Wetzel and Mari Ross, on Behalf of Themselves and All Others Similarly Situated, Equal Opportunity Commission as Amicus Curiae v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1975
- In Re Drexel Burnham Lambert Group, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1992
- County of Suffolk v. Long Island Lighting Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 1989
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Kramer v. TribeDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1994
- Friedman-Katz v. Lindt & Sprungli (USA), Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2010
- Sweet v. PfizerDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2005
- Palumbo v. Tele-Communications, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 1994
- Greenberg v. ColvinDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.