Legal Opinion
Gonzalez v. Apfel
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided September 22, 1998No. 3:97cv1089 (HBF)PublishedCited by 42 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RULING ON PENDING MOTIONS
FITZSIMMONS, United States Magistrate Judge.
Plaintiff, Aida Gonzalez, filed this action seeking review, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), of the decision of the Commissioner denying her claim for Supplemental Security Income (“SSI”) benefits under the Social Security Act. Plaintiff filed a motion for summary judgment and defendant moved for an order affirming the decision of the Commissioner. After consideration of the motions filed by plaintiff and defendant, plaintiffs motion is granted in part and denied in part and defendant’s motion is denied.
BACKGROUND
Plaintiff…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Bowen v. YuckertSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Elmer G. Berry v. Richard Schweiker, Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1982
- George MONGEUR, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Margaret HECKLER, Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
- Johnson v. BowenCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by42 opinions
- Campbell v. AstrueDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2009
- Bellamy v. ApfelDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2000
- Burden v. AstrueDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2008
- DelValle v. ApfelDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1999
- Smith v. BarnhartDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2005
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.