Legal Opinion
Campbell v. Astrue
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided January 23, 2009No. 3:07-cv-01551PublishedCited by 42 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RULING RE: PLAINTIFF’S OBJECTIONS TO THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S RECOMMENDED RULING [Doc. No. 17] DETERMINING PENDING MOTIONS [Doc. Nos. 13, 15]
JANET C. HALL, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
Plaintiff, Jacqueline Campbell, brings this action pursuant to section 205(g) of the Social Security Act, as amended, 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), requesting review of a final decision by defendant, the Commissioner of Social Security (“Commissioner”), that Campbell was not disabled from March 1992 to June 1995, and therefore is not entitled to Social Security Disability Insurance (“SSDI”) benefits. On August 22, 2008,…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Carmickle v. Commissioner, Social Security AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Janine A. WAGNER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1990
- Albert Shaw v. Shirley S. Chater, as Commissioner of the Social Security AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
- Patrick Balsamo v. Shirley S. Chater, Commissioner of Social SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by42 opinions
- Rogers v. AstrueDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2012
- Bailey v. SaulDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2021
- Bittle v. Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2020
- Blakey v. KijakaziDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2024
- Brown v. O'MalleyDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2025
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.