Legal Opinion
Smith v. Barnhart
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided December 29, 2005No. 04CV782 (JBA)PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Ruling on Defendant’s Objection to the Magistrate’s Recommended Ruling [Doc. # 18]
ARTERTON, District Judge.
Plaintiff brings this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) requesting review of a final decision by the Commissioner of Social Security (the “Commissioner”), which denied plaintiff disability insurance benefits. Currently pending before this Court is plaintiffs Motion for Summary Judgment or, Alternatively, an Order of Remand, see [Docs. ## 11, 15], and defendant’s Motion for Order Affirming the Decision of the Commissioner and in Opposition to Remand, see [Doc. # 14]. On July 26, 2005,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Ysabel Rosa v. John S. Callahan, Acting Commissioner of Social SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
- Heckler v. CampbellSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Patrick Balsamo v. Shirley S. Chater, Commissioner of Social SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
- Burnette YANCEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Kenneth S. APFEL, Commissioner of Social Security Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Paige v. SaulDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2022
- Pickett v. SaulDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2022
- Rossy v. City of BuffaloDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2023