Legal Opinion

Bellamy v. Apfel

District Court, D. Connecticut

Decided August 7, 2000No. 3:98CV02214 (GLG)PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION ON APPEAL

GOETTEL, District Judge.

This is an action brought by plaintiff, Mary Bellamy, against the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration pursuant to section 205(g) of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), to obtain judicial review of a final decision of the Commissioner denying her application for social security disability insurance benefits (“DIB”) under section 223 of the Act, 42 U.S.C. § 423. Plaintiff, who is pro se, has moved for an order reversing the decision of the Commissioner, or, in the alternative, remanding this case for further administrative…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  3. Sims v. ApfelSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  4. Rita Schaal v. Kenneth S. Apfel, Commissioner of Social Security, 1 Dockets 96-6212, 96-6316Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
  5. George MONGEUR, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Margaret HECKLER, Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Mikol v. BarnhartDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2007
  2. Beauchamp v. Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2024
  3. Castro v. Commissioner of the Social Security AdministrationDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2022
  4. Colon v. Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2024
  5. Gina B. v. Martin O’Malley, Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2026

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API