Burden v. Astrue
District Court, D. Connecticut
1Opinion of the Court
RULING RE: PLAINTIFF’S OBJECTIONS TO THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S RECOMMENDED RULING [Doc. No. 27] DETERMINING PENDING MOTIONS [Doc. Nos. 16, 21] AND DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO STRIKE [Doc. No. 28]
JANET C. HALL, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
Plaintiff, Peggy Burden, brings this action pursuant to § 1631(c)(3) of the Social Security Act, as amended, 42 U.S.C. § 1383(c)(3), requesting review of a final decision by defendant, the Commissioner of Social Security (“Commissioner”), that Burden is not disabled and therefore not entitled to Disability Insurance Benefits (“DIB”) and Supplemental Security Income…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Patrick Balsamo v. Shirley S. Chater, Commissioner of Social SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
- Nina Green-Younger v. Joanne B. Barnhart, Commissioner of the Social Security AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2003
- Herbert Carroll v. Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
- Charles BAPP, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Otis R. BOWEN, Secretary Health and Human Services, Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1986
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Collet v. KijakaziDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2023
- Hairston/Scott v. Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2020
- Henderson v. KijakaziDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2023
- Imperato v. SaulDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2022
- Johnson v. KijakaziDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2024
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.