Legal Opinion
Millview Cnty. Water Dist. v. State Water Res. Control Bd.
California Court of Appeal, 5th District
Decided February 22, 2019No. A146605PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMargulies, Acting P. J.
*588The State Water Resources Control Board (Board) seeks review of the judgment entered following the issuance of a peremptory writ of mandate directing the Board to vacate and set aside its Order No. WR 2014-0021. The Board asserts the petition filed by Millview County Water District (Millview) was untimely, the Board's hearing procedures were fair and in compliance with applicable law, and the trial court erred by not remanding the matter to the Board for further proceedings. We conclude Millview's petition was time-barred and, accordingly, reverse the judgment.
I. BACKGROUND
In June 2006,…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Briggs v. Eden Council for Hope & OpportunityCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
- People Ex Rel. Lockyer v. Shamrock Foods Co.California Supreme Court · 2000
- U.S. Army Corps of Eng'rs v. Hawkes Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 2016
- Federal Trade Commission v. Minneapolis-Honeywell Regulator Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Coalition of Concerned Communities, Inc. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Arrellano v. Sonoma CountyDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2024
- Jackson v. City of ModestoDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2022