Legal Opinion
Federal Trade Commission v. Minneapolis-Honeywell Regulator Co.
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided December 22, 1952No. 11PublishedCited by 244 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Vinson
The initial question in this case is one of jurisdiction— whether the petition for certiorari was filed within the period allowed by law.1 We hold that it was not.
The cause grows out of a proceeding initiated by petitioner, the Federal Trade Commission, in 1943. At that time, the Commission issued a three-count complaint against respondent. Count I charged a violation of § 5 of the Federal Trade Commission Act;2 Count II charged a violation of § 3 of the Clayton Act;3 Count III dealt with an alleged violation of § 2 (a) of the Clayton Act as amended by the Robinson-Patman Act.4 A protracted…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Dickinson v. Petroleum Conversion Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Toledo Scale Co. v. Computing Scale Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Federal Trade Commission v. Ruberoid Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Federal Power Commission v. Idaho Power Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Wayne United Gas Co. v. Owens-Illinois Glass Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by244 opinions
- Brown Shoe Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- United States v. AdamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Federal Communications Commission v. League of Women Voters of CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- William McNabola v. Chicago Transit AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
- Federal Trade Commission v. Colgate-Palmolive Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1965
239 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.