Arrellano v. Sonoma County
District Court, N.D. California
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 FRANCISCO ARRELLANO, et al., Case No. 23-cv-00187-DMR 8 Plaintiffs, ORDER ON MOTION TO DISMISS 9 v. SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT 10 SONOMA COUNTY, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 62 11 Defendants. 12 Plaintiffs Francisco Arrellano and his minor son S.A., by and through his guardian ad litem 13 Arrellano, bring this second amended complaint (“SAC”) against Defendants Sonoma County and 14 Deena Mistry. [Docket No. 61 (SAC).] Defendants move to dismiss. [Docket No. 62 (Mot.).] 15 This motion is appropriate for resolution without a…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Papasan v. AllainSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.