Legal Opinion

People v. Hardin

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 31, 1962No. Crim. 4033PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDevine, J.

The question in this case is whether appellant, who pleaded guilty to a charge of violation of section 32 of the Penal Code and who was sentenced to the state prison, had validly waived the right to counsel. The information filed against appellant charged that defendant “on or about June 12, 1961, at Pittsburg in Contra Costa County, State of California, did then and there unlawfully and wilfully and feloniously and with knowledge that the crime of burglary, a felony, was committed by Rodney Crismore, did harbor, conceal and aid said Rodney Crismore, with the intent that said Rodney Crismore…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Carnley v. CochranSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  3. People v. MattsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
  4. In Re JamesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  5. Bowman v. BowmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. People v. LaraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  2. People v. SzetoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1981
  3. People v. NguyenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
  4. In Re BirchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
  5. People v. Vela PradoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API