People v. Vela Prado
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
STANIFORTH, J.
Defendant Federico Yanez Gonzalez was charged by information in count one with armed robbery (Pen. Code, § 211), and in count two with being an accessory (Pen. Code, § 32), in that he knowingly harbored, concealed and aided his codefendant Pedro Vela Prado to escape arrest for the armed robbery charged in the first count. Upon trial the court instructed the juiy that Gonzalez could be “convicted or acquitted of any or all of the crimes charged.” The jury found him guilty on both counts. At sentencing the court dismissed the Penal Code section 32 charge and thereupon…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- People v. WatsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
- Illinois v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Bollenbach v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- People v. DuranCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by48 opinions
- State v. FinchWashington Supreme Court · 1999
- Navarro-Lopez v. GonzalesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- United States v. VidalCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- People v. SzetoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1981
- Staten v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1988
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.