Legal Opinion

Carnley v. Cochran

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided April 30, 1962No. 158PublishedCited by 1,851 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Brennan

The petitioner, who was not afforded the assistance of counsel for his defense at his trial, claims that, for this reason, his conviction by a jury in the Court of Record for Escambia County, Florida, deprived him of rights guaranteed by the Fourteenth Amendment. He obtained a provisional writ of habeas corpus from the Florida Supreme Court on his petition asserting that claim. *507However, that court, on the petition, the respondent's return and the petitioner's reply — but without any hearing — discharged the writ. 123 So. 2d 249. Since an important constitutional right is involved, we granted…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Moore v. MichiganSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  3. Rice v. OlsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  4. Bute v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  5. Uveges v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1948

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1,851 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. United States v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  5. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963

1,846 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API