Legal Opinion

In Re Birch

California Supreme Court

Decided October 26, 1973No. Crim. 16771PublishedCited by 82 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

TOBRINER, J.

In July 1972 petitioner, James Birch, appeared before the Los Angeles Municipal Court without counsel and entered a plea of guilty to the misdemeanor charge of violating Penal Code section 647, subdivision (a), which proscribes engaging in “. . . lewd or dissolute conduct in any public place or in any place open to the public or exposed to public view.” Birch now seeks a writ of habeas corpus, challenging the validity of his guilty plea on several grounds. As discussed below, we have concluded that petitioner’s conviction must be set aside because the record does not reveal…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Kercheval v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  2. In Re TahlCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
  3. People v. DanielsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
  4. In Re JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
  5. In Re SmileyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by82 opinions

  1. In Re YurkoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  2. State v. WardWashington Supreme Court · 1994
  3. People v. EdelbacherCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
  4. People v. HoveyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Pryor v. Municipal CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979

77 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API