Legal Opinion

In Re James

California Supreme Court

Decided January 22, 1952No. Crim. 5243PublishedCited by 143 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTraynor, J.

Petitioner, O. D. James, an inmate of San Quentin State Prison, seeks a writ of habeas corpus. He pleaded guilty to a charge of murder. The court determined that the crime was first degree murder- and sentenced petitioner to imprisonment for life. Petitioner now contends that his constitutional rights were violated and his plea of guilty vitiated because he was not given the aid of counsel.

Petitioner’s version of the events leading to the homicide are set forth in his affidavit. On December 2, 1944, a number of farm workers were engaged in a dice game at the canteen on the ranch where they…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Powell v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  2. Williams v. KaiserSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  3. Bute v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  4. Uveges v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  5. In Re BellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by143 opinions

  1. In Re TahlCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
  2. In Re DixonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Teitelbaum Furs, Inc. v. Dominion Ins. Co., Ltd.California Supreme Court · 1962
  4. People v. WilsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
  5. People v. RundleCalifornia Supreme Court · 2008

138 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API