Legal Opinion

Pope v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided March 7, 1932No. K-336PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBooth, Chief Justice

The plaintiff entered into a written contract on December 8, 1924, to construct for the defendant a subterranean tunnel. The tunnel when completed was to be about 8,600 feet in length, 6 feet in diameter inside measurement, and was located 40 feet beneath the surface of the earth. Construction work was to be completed within 24 months from December 24, 1924, and payment for performance was to be made upon a unit price basis. During the course of performance innumerable disagreements arose between the contractor and the Government officials in charge of the work, much ill feeling obtained, and…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Hollerbach v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  2. Christie v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  3. Hawkins v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  4. Ripley v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  5. Plumley v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1913

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. The Len Company and Associates v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1967
  2. Pope v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1944
  3. Sornsin Construction Co. v. StateMontana Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Pope v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1937
  5. Diamond v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1943

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API