Legal Opinion

Diamond v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided March 1, 1943No. 45418PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWhaley, Chief Justice

On March 31, 1939, plaintiff entered into a contract with the defendant to furnish all labor and materials required for certain betterments at the United States Assay Office in New York City. A part of the work called for in the contract was *433the cleaning of stains from the exterior stonework of the building1.

Paragraph 9 of the specifications provided a method for cleaning the stone. In this method phosphoric acid was to be used but it was found that this was not satisfactory. Experiments were conducted and plaintiff was allowed, at no additional cost to defendant, to use a solution of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Plumley v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  2. Pope v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1932
  3. Griffiths v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1932

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Sornsin Construction Co. v. StateMontana Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Globe Indemnity Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1944
  3. Alamo Construction Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1949

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API