Legal Opinion
The Len Company and Associates v. The United States
United States Court of Claims
Decided October 13, 1967No. 257-63PublishedCited by 70 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DAVIS, Judge:
This is another Government contract case in which the key question is whether the trial of the contractor’s claims shall be held administratively or in court. Cf. New York Shipbuilding Corp. v. United States, 385 F.2d 427, 180 Ct.Cl. - (June 1967); Universal Ecsco Corp. v. United States, Ct.Cl. 385 F.2d 421, decided this day. In August 1958 the Len Company entered into a Capehart Act housing contract with the Navy for 650 housing units at Pearl Harbor. As was customary for such projects, the work was divided into separate mortgage areas, the contract was made severable as to each…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- United States v. Utah Construction & Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
- United States v. Carlo Bianchi & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1963
- G. L. Christian and Associates v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1963
- United States v. Anthony Grace & Sons, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
- J. D. Hedin Construction Company, Inc., for Its Own Use and for the Use of Fischbach & Moore, Its Sub-Contractor v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1965
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by70 opinions
- WRB Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1968
- Miller Elevator Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1994
- J. D. Hedin Construction Company, Inc. v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1969
- Maine Yankee Atomic Power Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2000
- Tecom, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005
65 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.