Legal Opinion

Pope v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided December 6, 1937No. K-366PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The motion for a new trial was overruled in the following per curiam opinion :

Allen Pope, the plaintiff in the case of Pope v. United States, 76 C. Cls. 64, files a fourth motion for a new trial. The court in 81 C. Cls. 658 discussed in extenso the grounds for overruling a third motion containing substantially the same allegations of fact as appear in the present motion.

The allegations of the present motion, i. e., fraud, perjury, and deliberate suppression and perversion of facts, as well as deletion of the printed record, constitute most serious accusations against government officials, and…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United States v. ThrockmortonSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. Pope v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1932
  3. Pope v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1935

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Pope v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1944
  2. Pope v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1944
  3. Pope v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1944
  4. Pope v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1944

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API