Hawkins v. United States
Supreme Court of the United States
Appeal from tbe Court of Claims. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Clieeoed
Yerbal agreements between the parties to a .written contract, made before or at the time of the execution of the contract, are in general inadmissible to vary its terms or to affect its construction, the rule being that all such verbal agreements are to be considered as merged in the written instrument. But oral agreements subsequently made, on a new and valuable consideration, and before the breach of the contract, in cases not falling within the Statute of Frauds, stand upon a different footing; as such agreements may, if not within the Statute of Frauds, have the- effect to enlarge the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Whiteside v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
- Emerson v. SlaterSupreme Court of the United States · 1860
- Glacius v. . BlackNew York Court of Appeals · 1872
- Lee v. MunroeSupreme Court of the United States · 1813
- Merrill v. Ithaca & Owego Rail RoadNew York Supreme Court · 1837
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by109 opinions
- Royal Indemnity Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Wisconsin Central Railroad v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- n.sidney Nyhus v. Travel Management CorporationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1972
- United States v. GoltraSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Plumley v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
104 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.