Pope v. United States
United States Court of Claims
1Opinion of the CourtMaddest, Judge
This suit is here by virtue of a special act of Congress, the text of which is quoted later in this opinion. The facts preceding the enactment of the special act were as follows:
The plaintiff made a contract with the Government dated December 3, 1924, to construct a tunnel for the supply of water for the District of Columbia. The work was completed in 1927. The plaintiff claimed- that the Government had in various ways breached the contract and he brought a suit (K-366) in this court, asking for damages in the sum of $306,825.33. The case was tried and the court rendered a judgment for the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- United States v. KleinSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
- Hayburn's CaseSupreme Court of the United States · 1792
- Ex Parte Bakelite Corp'n.Supreme Court of the United States · 1929
- Williams v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Gordon v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1864
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Glidden Co. v. ZdanokSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- United States v. Sioux Nation of IndiansSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- United States v. Jenkins (In Re Richardson)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Missouri · 1985
- Menominee Tribe of Indians v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1944
- Seaboard Lumber Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1988
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.