Legal Opinion

Pope v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided January 3, 1944No. 45704PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMaddest, Judge

This suit is here by virtue of a special act of Congress, the text of which is quoted later in this opinion. The facts preceding the enactment of the special act were as follows:

The plaintiff made a contract with the Government dated December 3, 1924, to construct a tunnel for the supply of water for the District of Columbia. The work was completed in 1927. The plaintiff claimed- that the Government had in various ways breached the contract and he brought a suit (K-366) in this court, asking for damages in the sum of $306,825.33. The case was tried and the court rendered a judgment for the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. United States v. KleinSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
  2. Hayburn's CaseSupreme Court of the United States · 1792
  3. Ex Parte Bakelite Corp'n.Supreme Court of the United States · 1929
  4. Williams v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  5. Gordon v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1864

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Glidden Co. v. ZdanokSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. United States v. Sioux Nation of IndiansSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. United States v. Jenkins (In Re Richardson)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Missouri · 1985
  4. Menominee Tribe of Indians v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1944
  5. Seaboard Lumber Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1988

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API