Legal Opinion

Alexander v. Exxon Mobil

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 24, 2013No. B242458PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

ZELON, J.—

INTRODUCTION

In April of 2010, over 700 plaintiffs filed a toxic tort action alleging injury from exposure to environmental contamination at a low-income housing complex constructed on a former oil storage facility. Defendants filed a demurrer arguing that the action was time-barred because the allegations in the complaint demonstrated plaintiffs knew, or should have known, of the environmental contamination several years before filing suit. The trial court sustained the demurrer without leave to amend against a subset of approximately 100 plaintiffs who admitted receiving…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Serrano v. PriestCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Fox v. Ethicon Endo-Surgery, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Aryeh v. Canon Business Solutions, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2013
  4. Mangini v. Aerojet-General Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1991
  5. CAMSI IV v. Hunter Technology Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1991

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Dep't of Forestry & Fire Prot. v. Howell, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
  2. Rosas v. BASF CorporationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
  3. City of Los Angeles v. City of Los Angeles Employee Relations BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
  4. Greenfield MHP Associates, L.P. v. Ametek, Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 2015
  5. (PC) Price v. PachecoDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2024

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API