Legal Opinion
CAMSI IV v. Hunter Technology Corp.
California Court of Appeal
Decided June 5, 1991No. H006806PublishedCited by 87 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BAMATTRE-MANOUKIAN, J.
Hunter Technology Corporation (Hunter) manufactured printed circuit boards on a parcel of real property in Santa Clara County for a period of years ending in 1983. Title to the parcel passed to CAMSI IV, a California general partnership, in May 1985. In December 1988 CAMSI IV sued Hunter, and several other defendants, alleging in pertinent part that in its manufacturing operation Hunter had discharged harmful substances referred to by CAMSI IV as “volatile organic chemicals” (VOCs), including trichloroethene (TCE), into the parcel’s soil and groundwater, that a…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Blank v. KirwanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
- Gruenberg v. Aetna InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
- Jolly v. Eli Lilly & Co.California Supreme Court · 1988
- Goodman v. KennedyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- Budd v. NixenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by87 opinions
- Chubb Custom Insurance Company v. Space Systems/ Loral, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
- Fontenot v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.California Court of Appeal · 2011
- Schnall v. Hertz CorporationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
- San Francisco Unified School District v. W.R. Grace & Company-ConnecticutCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
- Herrera v. Federal National Mortgage Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
82 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.