Legal Opinion

Turner v. Hopper

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 12, 1948No. Civ. 3478PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMarks, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment which enjoined defendants from interfering with the free passage of rain and surface waters from plaintiffs’ property flowing across defendants’ property, and required defendants to remove a “fill-in and dam” located on their property.

The evidence in this case is not conflicting. The precise problem presented does not seem to have been decided in the exact form appearing here in any California decision to which our attention has been directed.

Plaintiffs are the owners of 8 acres of land lying east of Verano Road in Orange County, and defendants own 5 acres on…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Archer v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  2. San Gabriel Valley Country Club v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  3. Lebrun v. RichardsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
  4. State ex rel. State Reclamation Board v. ClausenWashington Supreme Court · 1920
  5. Mogle v. MooreCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Haferkamp v. City of Rock HillSupreme Court of Missouri · 1958
  2. Tri-Chem, Inc. v. Los Angeles County Flood Control DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
  3. Jergens v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
  4. County of Colusa v. StrainCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
  5. Martinson v. HugheyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API