Legal Opinion

Martinson v. Hughey

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 7, 1988No. F007104PublishedCited by 7 opinions

[Opinion certified for partial publication.*]

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BROWN (G.A.), J. *

Defendants, cross-complainants and appellants, David F. Hughey and his wife (Hughey) appeal from a judgment entered after a six-day bench trial in favor of plaintiffs and cross-defendants Irvin A. Martinson and his wife and Robert Pokelwaldt and his wife (hereinafter respondents) enjoining Hughey from obstructing the flow of surface and irrigation water off respondents’ property onto Hughey’s property and awarding damages to respondents. Hughey was denied damages to his home and orchard from flooding which he sought by way of cross-complaint.

Statement of Facts

The…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Keys v. RomleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Stevens v. Oakdale Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
  3. Cheesman v. OdermottCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
  4. Phillips v. BurkeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
  5. Turner v. HopperCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Locklin v. City of LafayetteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Contra Costa County v. Pinole Point Properties, LLCCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
  3. Bittersweet Farms, Inc. v. ZimbelmanColorado Court of Appeals · 1998
  4. LOMBARD ACCEPTANCE v. Town of San AnselmoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
  5. Locklin v. City of LafayetteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API