Legal Opinion
Fout v. State Personnel Board
California Court of Appeal
Decided October 21, 1982No. Civ. 63219PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
HASTINGS, J.
Defendants, State Personnel Board and California Highway Patrol (CHP), appeal from a judgment ordering the issuance of a peremptory writ of mandate and remanding the case back to the State Personnel Board for the sole purpose of reconsidering the penalty of dismissal.
Plaintiff Louis Fout has been employed by the California Highway Patrol as a state traffic officer since 1966. In December 1979, he was served with a notice of punitive action charging that the alleged acts of misconduct hereafter described constituted grounds for dismissal under the following subdivisions of…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Skelly v. State Personnel BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
- Barber v. State Personnel BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- Blake v. State Personnel BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
- Warren v. State Personnel Bd.California Court of Appeal · 1979
- Stanton v. State Personnel BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Flowers v. State Personnel BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
- Ackerman v. State Personnel Bd.California Court of Appeal · 1983
- Anderson v. State Personnel BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
- Yancey v. State Personnel Bd.California Court of Appeal · 1985
- Ackerman v. State Personnel BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.