Legal Opinion
Anderson v. State Personnel Board
California Court of Appeal
Decided September 8, 1987No. B024081PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
FEINERMAN, P. J.
This is an appeal from a trial court judgment denying appellant’s petition for a writ of mandate following his dismissal as an officer with the California Highway Patrol (CHP) by the State Personnel Board (Board). Appellant contends that his dismissal for violations of Government Code section 19572, including failure of good behavior (Gov. Code, § 19572, subd. (t)), was improper because his off-duty behavior was not rationally related to his employment and because the penalty of dismissal was an abuse of the Board’s discretion.
Background
On March 25, 1983, appellant was…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Skelly v. State Personnel BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
- Commodore Home Systems, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
- Barber v. State Personnel BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- Board of Trustees v. StubblefieldCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
- Flowers v. State Personnel BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Sager v. County of YubaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
- Hankla v. Long Beach Civil Service CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
- Thompson v. State Personnel BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
- Opinion No. (2000), California Attorney General Reports2000