Warren v. State Personnel Bd.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
REYNOSO, J.
The questions we face are these: First, may the California Highway Patrol dismiss from its employ a patrolman who: (1) attended (with expectations of sexual gratification) and did participate in a sexual act at an advertised commercially sponsored transvestite “party” for which he paid an attendance fee; (2) did have or reasonably should have had knowledge that prostitution was practiced at the gathering; (3) untruthfully denied his full knowledge and participation to local police officers performing their official investigative duties at the site after a lawful raid upon…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Skelly v. State Personnel BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
- Morrison v. State Board of EducationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
- Ward v. TaggartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
- Barber v. State Personnel BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- Board of Education v. Jack M.California Supreme Court · 1977
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Doyle v. City of ChinoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981
- Titus v. Civil Service CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982
- Stanton v. State Personnel BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
- Cate v. State Personnel BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
- Fout v. State Personnel BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.