Legal Opinion
Ackerman v. State Personnel Bd.
California Court of Appeal
Decided June 27, 1983No. AO21059PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
145 Cal.App.3d 395 (1983)
193 Cal. Rptr. 190
E. DANIEL ACKERMAN, Plaintiff and Respondent,
v.
STATE PERSONNEL BOARD, Defendant and Appellant; DEPARTMENT OF CALIFORNIA HIGHWAY PATROL, Real Party in Interest and Appellant.
Docket No. AO21059.
Court of Appeals of California, First District, Division Three.
June 27, 1983.
COUNSEL
John K. Van de Kamp, Attorney General, Andrea S. Ordin, Chief Assistant Attorney General, and Marian M. Johnston, Deputy Attorney General, for Defendant and Appellant and for Real Party in Interest and Appellant.
Richard J. Romanski and Hession, Creedon, Hamlin, Kelly, Hanson &…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Skelly v. State Personnel BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
- Barber v. State Personnel BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- Board of Trustees v. StubblefieldCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
- Ng v. State Personnel BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
- Gee v. California State Personnel BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Lucas v. Murray City Civil Service CommissionCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1997
- Flowers v. State Personnel BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
- Paulino v. Civil Service CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
- Robison v. City of MantecaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
- Nicolini v. County of TuolumneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.