Ackerman v. State Personnel Board
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
FEINBERG, J.
On this appeal by the California Highway Patrol (CHP) and the State Personnel Board (Board) from a judgment granting a peremptory writ of mandamus (Code Civ. Proc., § 1094.5) to compel the Board to reconsider the dismissal of respondent Ackerman, the only question is whether the penalty imposed constituted an abuse of discretion. The Board and CHP contend that the trial court erred by substituting its discretion for that of the employer and the Board. We agree and reverse.
In October 1981, Ackerman was served with a notice of punitive action charging that the alleged acts of…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Skelly v. State Personnel BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
- Barber v. State Personnel BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- Board of Trustees v. StubblefieldCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
- Ng v. State Personnel BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
- Gee v. California State Personnel BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Ackerman v. State Personnel Bd.California Court of Appeal · 1983