Legal Opinion

Ackerman v. State Personnel Board

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 27, 1983No. AO21059PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

FEINBERG, J.

On this appeal by the California Highway Patrol (CHP) and the State Personnel Board (Board) from a judgment granting a peremptory writ of mandamus (Code Civ. Proc., § 1094.5) to compel the Board to reconsider the dismissal of respondent Ackerman, the only question is whether the penalty imposed constituted an abuse of discretion. The Board and CHP contend that the trial court erred by substituting its discretion for that of the employer and the Board. We agree and reverse.

In October 1981, Ackerman was served with a notice of punitive action charging that the alleged acts of…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Skelly v. State Personnel BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Barber v. State Personnel BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Board of Trustees v. StubblefieldCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
  4. Ng v. State Personnel BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
  5. Gee v. California State Personnel BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Ackerman v. State Personnel Bd.California Court of Appeal · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API