Legal Opinion

Stanton v. State Personnel Board

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 16, 1980No. Civ. 4857PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

ZENOVICH, J.

Appellant appeals from an order denying a peremptory writ of mandamus to compel respondent to set aside a decision in which it imposed a 5 percent reduction in salary against appellant for a period of three months.

Appellant has been employed as a state psychiatric technician continuously from sometime in 1960. Prior to the punitive action taken by respondent, he had served in the position of senior psychiatric technician II for ward No. 22 at the Atascadero State Hospital. On April 12, 1977, he was served with a notice of punitive action charging that the alleged acts of…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Bixby v. PiernoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Skelly v. State Personnel BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Morrison v. State Board of EducationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
  4. Board of Education v. Dresden SwanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
  5. Board of Education v. Jack M.California Supreme Court · 1977

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Schmitt v. City of RialtoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
  2. Flowers v. State Personnel BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
  3. Ackerman v. State Personnel Bd.California Court of Appeal · 1983
  4. Goggin v. State Personnel BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
  5. Edgerton v. State Personnel BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API