Legal Opinion
Acierno v. Hayward
Supreme Court of Delaware
Decided October 4, 2004No. 310,2004PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BERGER, Justice:
The appellant Frank Acierno filed this appeal from an opinion of the Court of Chancery, dated July 1, 2004, granting the appellees’ (collectively “DelDOT”) motion to disqualify Acierno’s additional counsel, Richard L. Abbott, Esquire, because of a conflict of interest arising from Abbott’s former representation of DelDOT. 1 The Clerk of this Court issued a notice to Acierno to show cause why this appeal should not be dismissed for his failure to comply with Supreme Court Rule 42 in attempting to appeal an interlocutory order.
Acierno (or, more accurately, Abbott) 2 filed a…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Richardson-Merrell Inc. v. Koller Ex Rel. KollerSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- In Re Appeal of Infotechnology, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1990
- J. I. Kislak Mortgage Corp. v. William Matthews, Builder, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1973
- Gottlieb v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1997
- Tyson Foods, Inc. v. Aetos Corp.Supreme Court of Delaware · 2002
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Mitchell v. HaldarSupreme Court of Delaware · 2005
- Flores Rentals, L.L.C. v. FloresSupreme Court of Kansas · 2007
- Settendown Public Utility, LLC v. Waterscape Utility, LLCCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2013
- Dunn v. RileySupreme Court of Delaware · 2004
- Estate of Markheim ex rel. Shumway v. MarkheimSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2008
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.