Legal Opinion

Mitchell v. Haldar

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided August 22, 2005No. 348,2004PublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOLLAND, Justice:

This is an appeal by the plaintiffs-appellants, John Mitchell, Sr. and Donna Mitchell, following a jury trial in the Superior Court in an action for alleged medical malpractice against the defendant-appellee, Dr. Joydeep Haidar. The jury returned a verdict in favor of the plaintiffs in the total amount of $15,000. The plaintiffs filed a motion for a new trial, arguing that the damage award was inadequate, because it was substantially less than the medical expenses of $37,997.27. That motion was denied. The plaintiffs have standing to appeal as aggrieved parties,…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Electrical Fittings Corp. v. ThomasSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  3. Forney v. ApfelSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  4. Propeller Monticello v. MollisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1855
  5. Acuar v. LetourneauSupreme Court of Virginia · 2000

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. Robinson v. BatesOhio Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Stanley v. WalkerIndiana Supreme Court · 2009
  3. White v. Jubitz Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 2009
  4. Lopez v. Safeway Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2006
  5. Swanson v. BrewsterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2010

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API