Legal Opinion
Settendown Public Utility, LLC v. Waterscape Utility, LLC
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided November 13, 2013No. A13A0830; A13A0831PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Branch, Judge.
Settendown Public Utility, LLC, Ken Curren, Camella Curren, and Waterscape Services, LLC (collectively “Settendown”), and their attorney, George E. Butler II, have filed separate direct appeals from an order of the trial court disqualifying Butler from representing Settendown in a lawsuit filed against it by Waterscape Utility, LLC (“Waterscape”).1 Waterscape filed a motion to dismiss each of these *653appeals, arguing that an order disqualifying counsel is an interlocutory order and that Settendown and Butler failed to obtain a certificate of immediate review or follow the…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Coopers & Lybrand v. LivesaySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. RisjordSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Digital Equipment Corp. v. Desktop Direct, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Mohawk Industries, Inc. v. CarpenterSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Eidson v. CroutchCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2016
- BEFEKADU v. ADDIS INTERNATIONAL MONEY TRANSFER, LLC Et Al.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2015
- FEIN Et Al. v. CHENAULT Et Al.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2014
- BUCKNER-WEBB v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2022
- Eshleman v. KeyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2014
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.