Legal Opinion

Estate of Markheim ex rel. Shumway v. Markheim

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided September 4, 2008PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGorman, J.

[¶ 1] Ryan Markheim and Heather Markheim appeal from a decision of the Superior Court (York County, Fritzsche, J.) denying their motion to disqualify G. Charles Shumway II, Esq., from representing the Estate of Anna L. Markheim in this action to collect a debt allegedly owed to the Estate by Ryan and Heather. Ryan and Heather contend pursuant to M. Bar R. 3.4(d)(l)(i) that Shumway should have been disqualified because he previously represented them in litigation that was substantially similar and in which he was privy to confidential information. Although the Markheims concede that the appeal…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. RisjordSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. Masiello v. Perini Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1985
  3. Flores Rentals, L.L.C. v. FloresSupreme Court of Kansas · 2007
  4. Casco Northern Bank v. JBI Associates, Ltd.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1995
  5. Richers v. Marsh & McLennan Group AssociatesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1990

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Fiber Materials, Inc. v. SubiliaSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2009
  2. Liberty v. BennettSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2012
  3. Morin v. Maine Education Ass'nSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2010
  4. Nergaard v. Town of Westport IslandSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2009
  5. State of Maine v. Sharon CarrilloSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2018

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API