Legal Opinion

Gottlieb v. State

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided July 25, 1997No. 308, 1997PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VEASEY, Chief Justice:

Before the Court is the State’s motion to dismiss a purported interlocutory appeal by Robert C. Gottlieb, Esquire, a lawyer whose admission pro hac vice to represent a defendant in the underlying criminal case was revoked by the trial judge. As is customary in the disposition of motions in this Court, we do not reach the merits. 1 We decide, in this aspect of the case, as we decided separately in the attempted appeal by the defendant, Amy S. Grossberg, 2 that we have no jurisdiction to hear an interlocutory appeal in a criminal case and that the State’s motion to dismiss…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Coopers & Lybrand v. LivesaySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Flanagan v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Richardson-Merrell Inc. v. Koller Ex Rel. KollerSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Johnson v. FankellSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  5. Gannett Co., Inc. v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1989

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Acierno v. HaywardSupreme Court of Delaware · 2004
  2. Benson v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2018
  3. Brittingham v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2020
  4. Brown v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2019
  5. Brunhammer v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2016

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API