Gottlieb v. State
Supreme Court of Delaware
1Opinion of the Court
VEASEY, Chief Justice:
Before the Court is the State’s motion to dismiss a purported interlocutory appeal by Robert C. Gottlieb, Esquire, a lawyer whose admission pro hac vice to represent a defendant in the underlying criminal case was revoked by the trial judge. As is customary in the disposition of motions in this Court, we do not reach the merits. 1 We decide, in this aspect of the case, as we decided separately in the attempted appeal by the defendant, Amy S. Grossberg, 2 that we have no jurisdiction to hear an interlocutory appeal in a criminal case and that the State’s motion to dismiss…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Coopers & Lybrand v. LivesaySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Flanagan v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Richardson-Merrell Inc. v. Koller Ex Rel. KollerSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Johnson v. FankellSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Gannett Co., Inc. v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1989
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Acierno v. HaywardSupreme Court of Delaware · 2004
- Benson v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2018
- Brittingham v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2020
- Brown v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2019
- Brunhammer v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2016
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.