Legal Opinion

Dunn v. Riley

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided December 1, 2004No. 195, 2004PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JACOBS, Justice.

The plaintiff below, Karen Dunn, appeals from the denial by an order of the Superior Court of her motion for a new trial after a jury rendered a verdict for the defendant, James Riley. The jury found that although Riley was negligent in rear-ending Dunn’s car, his negligence was not the proximate cause of Dunn’s injuries. We conclude that based upon the evidence presented at trial, the jury verdict was reasonable. We also reject Dunn’s claim of entitlement to a new trial based on Riley’s testimony that the collision was minor, because any resulting prejudice was cured by the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Storey v. CamperSupreme Court of Delaware · 1979
  2. Koutoufaris v. DickSupreme Court of Delaware · 1992
  3. Eskin v. CardenSupreme Court of Delaware · 2004
  4. Davis v. MauteSupreme Court of Delaware · 2001
  5. DeAngelis v. HarrisonSupreme Court of Delaware · 1993

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Baron Tube Company, the Partnership of Hyman Baron and Jay Baron and Hyman Baron, Individually v. The Transport Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1966
  2. Mitchell v. HaldarSupreme Court of Delaware · 2005
  3. General Motors Corp. v. GrenierSupreme Court of Delaware · 2009
  4. Lang v. MorantSupreme Court of Delaware · 2005
  5. Burkett-Wood v. HainesSupreme Court of Delaware · 2006

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API