Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Deocampo v. Ahn

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 30, 2002No. B147135PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

CROSKEY, J.

In this suit for personal injury based on allegations of medical malpractice, plaintiff Joe Deocampo (plaintiff) appeals from an amended judgment. Defendants Richard S. Ahn, M.D. and Melvin Belafsky, M.D. (Ahn, Belafsky, collectively defendants) have cross-appealed from the same amended judgment.

The judgment was amended to include the court’s decisions on certain postjudgment matters, and it is these that are the subject of this appeal. They relate to (1) the proper calculation of the credit due to nonsettling defendants for a plaintiffs prior settlement with the settling…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Lakin v. Watkins Associated IndustriesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
  2. American Bank & Trust Co. v. Community HospitalCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Hess v. Ford Motor Co.California Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Walling v. KimballCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  5. Tsemetzin v. Coast Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Dawson v. WithycombeCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2007
  2. Berg v. DardenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
  3. Markow v. RosnerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
  4. Maaso v. SignerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
  5. Weinberg v. Safeco Ins. Co. of AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API