Legal Opinion
Berg v. Darden
California Court of Appeal
Decided July 16, 2004No. B171741PublishedCited by 35 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BOLAND, J.
FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
In September 2001, appellant Erika A. Berg initiated this action against her former dentist, respondent Ronald L. Darden, for injuries she suffered as a result of his alleged malpractice.
On February 8, 2002, Berg’s attorney, Arlan A. Cohen, sent a letter to Darden’s attorney, Burdick M. Ray. The three-page letter addressed, among other things, discovery-related issues and the parties’ respective positions regarding the merits of the litigation. In the last paragraph of the letter, which forms the basis for the instant appeal, Cohen stated:
“This…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Folsom v. Butte County Assn. of GovernmentsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
- T. M. Cobb Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
- American Airlines, Inc. v. Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & HamptonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
- Poster v. Southern California Rapid Transit DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
- Rappenecker v. Sea-Land Service, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1979
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- Fassberg Construction Co. v. Housing AuthorityCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
- Wohlgemuth v. Caterpillar Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2012
- Seever v. Copley Press, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2006
- On-Line Power, Inc. v. MazurCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
- Westamerica Bank v. Mbg Industries, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2007
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.