Legal Opinion

Hess v. Ford Motor Co.

California Supreme Court

Decided February 28, 2002No. S092697PublishedCited by 136 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BROWN, J.

This case presents two unrelated issues. First, the plaintiff enters into a release agreement with one tortfeasor and his insurance company. The agreement, however, contains broad language ostensibly releasing all potential tortfeasors from liability. We now consider whether this language bars the plaintiff’s claims against a tortfeasor who was not a party to the release. Based on the uncontroverted evidence at trial, we conclude it does not.

Second, the plaintiff obtains a judgment more favorable than his offer of compromise under Code of Civil Procedure section 998 (section…

2Cases cited41 opinions

  1. Lungren v. DeukmejianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Rosenthal v. Great Western Financial Securities Corp.California Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Murphy v. Allstate InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  5. DuBois v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by136 opinions

  1. Martinez v. CombsCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010
  2. Foradori v. HarrisCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2008
  3. Norcia v. Samsung Telecommunications America, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
  4. Skilstaf, Inc. v. Cvs Caremark Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
  5. City of Santa Barbara v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007

131 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API